Skip to content

Release v5.2.0 mailto error — resource not found #1595

Closed

Description

@skwps

Epubcheck 5.2 is giving an error for an email link. The same EPUB shows no error in epubcheck 5.1.

ERROR(RSC-007): Referenced resource "mailto:[address]@[school].edu" could not be found in the EPUB.

Is there another step needed now to properly include an email link?

Activity

  1. rdeltour commented on Jan 3, 2025

    @rdeltour
    Member

    Thanks for the report!
    Sounds like a regression bug, possibly introduced by #1582.

    I’ll try to reproduce and fix in the next maintenance release.

  2. self-assigned this
    on Jan 3, 2025
  3. added
    priority: highTo be processed and published in the next release
    type: false-positiveThis issue is about valid content being incorrectly rejected
    status: needs test caseA reproducible test case is needed to move the issue forward
    on Jan 3, 2025
  4. wareid commented on Jan 8, 2025

    @wareid

    If it's helpful at all, I just came across this bug as well in multiple EPUB files while running my standard regression test for Kobo EPUBCheck integration. This causes EPUBs that previously validated with no errors in versions 4.2.6, 5.0.1, and 5.1.0 to throw validation errors.

  5. Changilainen commented on Jan 9, 2025

    @Changilainen

    I was about to create a new issue of this too. I get the same error with the version 5.2.0 but not with version 5.1.0. Hope it will be fixed asap before more and more people start to use the 5.2.0 version.

  6. prithiviclteam commented on Jan 9, 2025

    @prithiviclteam

    Dear @rdeltour,

    We have encountered the same issue with mailto: links in Epubcheck 5.2. Thank you for acknowledging the problem and your efforts to address it in the next maintenance release.

    Could you kindly share if there is an estimated timeline for the release? This information will help us plan accordingly on our end.

    Looking forward to your response.

    Best regards,
    Prithiviraj M

  7. PurushM commented on Jan 10, 2025

    @PurushM

    We have encountered the same issue with mailto: links in Epubcheck 5.2. Thank you for acknowledging the problem and your efforts to address it in the next maintenance release.

    The "...@personnel.com" links, but I know for a fact that "mailto:marsh@innsmouth.net" is not a valid email link.

    Please check and update

    Thanks,
    Purushothaman M

  8. rdeltour commented on Jan 10, 2025

    @rdeltour
    Member

    Thanks everyone for confirming the bug. I am able to reproduce it myself and will work on a fix ASAP.

    As for an estimated timeline, I can publish a patch release (v5.2.1) as soon as the bug is fixed.

    This is quite a serious bug (false positive) which is likely to impact a significant number of publications, so I believe it is worth releasing a patch release sooner rather than wait for the next regular maintenance release.

    @wareid

    I just came across this bug as well in multiple EPUB files while running my standard regression test for Kobo EPUBCheck integration.

    have you noticed any other issues in Kobo's regression tests? I'm trying to estimate if I can publish a patch ASAP or wait a little in case other regression bugs are detected.

  9. added a commit that references this issue on Jan 10, 2025
    70d10ac
  10. added
    status: has PRThe issue is being processed in a pull request
    and removed
    priority: highTo be processed and published in the next release
    status: needs test caseA reproducible test case is needed to move the issue forward
    on Jan 10, 2025
  11. wareid commented on Jan 10, 2025

    @wareid

    I just came across this bug as well in multiple EPUB files while running my standard regression test for Kobo EPUBCheck integration.

    have you noticed any other issues in Kobo's regression tests? I'm trying to estimate if I can publish a patch ASAP or wait a little in case other regression bugs are detected.

    I haven't seen any other issues in our regression tests, everything else is the same!

  12. rdeltour commented on Jan 14, 2025

    @rdeltour
    Member

    I just published v5.2.1, which fixes this regression bug.
    Thanks again to everyone who reported the issue and tested for regression issues!

  13. PurushM commented on Jan 15, 2025

    @PurushM

    Thanks for updated tool.

  14. prithiviclteam commented on Jan 16, 2025

    @prithiviclteam
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

priority: criticalTo be processed and published ASAPstatus: has PRThe issue is being processed in a pull requesttype: false-positiveThis issue is about valid content being incorrectly rejected

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    ⌂ 换网址