_From [pier@usrz.com](https://code.google.com/u/113950261889628628863/) on May 25, 2014 03:20:53_ Can `@`ProvidedBy require a javax.inject.Provider instead of a com.google.inject one? Given that the latter extends the former, all code should work (theoretically)... **Attachment:** [gist](https://gist.github.com/d2e10b9cdfe3cf3ad5f0) _[ProvidedBy.java](https://gist.githubusercontent.com/gissuebot/d2e10b9cdfe3cf3ad5f0/raw/e46ea0926d59e073a1252144c5c9eb12f2af9b0c/ProvidedBy.java)_ _Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=808_
Activity
Make @ProvidedBy take a javax.inject.Provider.
Make @ProvidedBy take a javax.inject.Provider.