Skip to content

JpaLocalTxnInterceptor incorrectly assumes that @Transactional methods never handle exceptions #1136

Closed

Description

@Vogel612

When reading through JpaLocalTxnInterceptor#invoke we can see the following comment:

   //everything was normal so commit the txn (do not move into try block above as it
    //  interferes with the advised method's throwing semantics)
    try {
      txn.commit();
    } finally {
      //close the em if necessary
      if (null != didWeStartWork.get() ) {
        didWeStartWork.remove();
        unitOfWork.end();
      }
    }

This is a patently false assumption when considering persistence methods that follow another schema. Example:

@Transactional
public NiceResponse<EntityType> create(EntityType instance) {
  try{
    try {
      entityManager.persist(instance);
      entityManager.flush();
      return NiceResponse.success(instance);
    } catch (PersistenceException ex) {
       // unwrap to find actual cause and use that to find out what happened
      entityManager.getTransaction().rollback(); // this is theoretically optional
      thow ex.getCause();
    }
  } catch (ConstraintViolationException ex) {
    return NiceResponse.failure("Some useful error message", ex);
  }
  // possibly further catch blocks
}

Commiting the transaction after this method will throw an Exception all error cases, simply because the transaction has been rolled back already, but there's no Exception thrown to early-exit invoke.

Activity

  1. Vogel612 commented on Nov 15, 2017

    @Vogel612
    ContributorAuthor

    Assuming I'd be assigned, it seems that checking for the transaction's status before trying to commit it would be appropriate.

    I'd suggest using the following alternative:

    try {
      if (txn.isRollbackOnly()) {
        txn.rollback();
      } else {
        txn.commit();
      }
    }
    

    I'm not terribly experienced with the detailed semantics of JPA Transactions though, so I might be missing something.

  2. added a commit that references this issue on Nov 16, 2017
    fe9ae37
  3. added a commit that references this issue on Apr 20, 2023
    b9df984
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      ⌂ 换网址