Skip to content

Improve handling of Exception<T> - #272

Merged
niemyjski merged 6 commits into
exceptionless:masterfrom
elachlan:improve-handling-of-ExceptionT
May 9, 2022
Merged

niemyjski merged 6 commits into
exceptionless:masterfrom
elachlan:improve-handling-of-ExceptionT

Conversation

@elachlan

@elachlan elachlan commented May 4, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@niemyjski niemyjski left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR, can we also add test cases specifically addressed in the issue around structs. I also left some feedback about performance concerns

@ejsmith should we be worried about this creating lots of new stacks due to hash changes for type names?

@elachlan

elachlan commented May 4, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

How about this?

private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Type, string> TypeNameCache = new ConcurrentDictionary<Type, string>();
public static string GetRealTypeName(this Type t) {
    if (TypeNameCache.TryGetValue(t, out string name)) {
        return name;
    }
    if (!t.IsGenericType)
        return t.FullName.Replace('+','.');

    StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
    ReadOnlySpan<char> fullName = t.FullName.AsSpan();
    int plusIndex = fullName.IndexOf('+');
    if (plusIndex > 0) {
        sb.Append(fullName.Slice(0, plusIndex).ToArray());
        sb.Append('.');
    }
    int length = fullName.IndexOf('`') - (plusIndex > 0 ? plusIndex + 1 : 0);
    sb.Append(fullName.Slice(plusIndex > 0 ? plusIndex + 1 : 0, length).ToArray());
    sb.Append('<');
    bool appendComma = false;
    foreach (Type arg in t.GetGenericArguments()) {
        if (appendComma) { sb.Append(','); }
        sb.Append(GetRealTypeName(arg));
        appendComma = true;
    }
    sb.Append('>');
    return TypeNameCache.GetOrAdd(t, sb.ToString());
}

@elachlan

elachlan commented May 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Should I just use the TypeNameHelper?

public static string GetTypeDisplayName(Type type, bool fullName = true, bool includeGenericParameterNames = false)
{
var builder = new StringBuilder();
ProcessType(builder, type, new DisplayNameOptions(fullName, includeGenericParameterNames));
return builder.ToString();
}

Only issue I see is that it includes the +, so instead of:
Exceptionless.Tests.Plugins.PluginTestBase.GenericException<Exceptionless.Tests.Plugins.PluginTestBase.ErrorCategory>
You get:
Exceptionless.Tests.Plugins.PluginTestBase+GenericException<Exceptionless.Tests.Plugins.PluginTestBase+ErrorCategory>

If this is okay, I will use that. I also suggest we add a cache of some kind to TypeNameHelper.

Added TypeNameHelper.GetTypeFullDisplayName and cache
@elachlan

elachlan commented May 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@niemyjski How is that? Do you want a couple more test cases?

@elachlan
elachlan requested a review from niemyjski May 6, 2022 21:27
@elachlan

elachlan commented May 6, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ejsmith any chance of a quick review?

@niemyjski niemyjski left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some comments, It's nice that we found an existing method that handles this!

@elachlan
elachlan requested a review from niemyjski May 9, 2022 12:08
@elachlan

elachlan commented May 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Left some comments, It's nice that we found an existing method that handles this!

All sorted. Thanks for the review!

@niemyjski niemyjski left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@niemyjski
niemyjski merged commit 87fd963 into exceptionless:master May 9, 2022
@niemyjski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for the PR! These are really nice changes @elachlan was there any other changes you wanted to get in prior to a release?

@elachlan

elachlan commented May 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for the PR! These are really nice changes @elachlan was there any other changes you wanted to get in prior to a release?

I won't have the time to work on this for the next two weeks.

I was going to look at using spans in place of string operations at some point.

@niemyjski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think if anything, we just report this possible optimization to the upstream dependency.

@elachlan
elachlan deleted the improve-handling-of-ExceptionT branch May 9, 2022 13:59
@elachlan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Is this the upstream?
https://github.com/benaadams/Ben.Demystifier/

@niemyjski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve handling of Exception<T> where T : struct

2 participants

⌂ 换网址